No. 23-5389
Wilfredo Rodriguez v. United States
Tags: appellate-review circuit-split colorable-claim criminal-procedure district-court-discretion due-process federal-criminal-procedure judicial-discretion judicial-response sentencing sentencing-argument
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2023-10-06
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Where a federal criminal defendant raises a colorable sentencing argument, must the district court acknowledge and respond to it?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Where a federal criminal defendant raises a colorable sentencing argument, must the district court acknowledge and respond to it? i INTERESTED PARTIES There are no
Docket Entries
2023-10-10
Petition DENIED.
2023-09-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/6/2023.
2023-09-06
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2023-08-15
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 18, 2023)
Attorneys
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Wilfredo Rodriguez
Janice L. Bergmann — Federal Public Defender's Office, Petitioner