No. 23-5391
Walter Raul Maguina v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appeal appellate-review criminal-procedure district-court due-process evidence extrinsic-evidence harmless-error judicial-procedure prejudice prejudicial-evidence remand
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Immigration
SocialSecurity Immigration
Latest Conference:
2023-10-06
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a district court's failure to address the prejudicial nature of extrinsic evidence requires remand
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Whether a district court’s failure to address the prejudicial nature of extrinsic evidence requires remand. ii No. In the Supreme Court of the United States WALTER RAUL MAGUINA, PETITIONER, V. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, RESPONDENT PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Petitioner Walter Raul Maguina asks that a writ of certiorari issue to review the opinion and judgment entered by the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit on May 19, 2023.
Docket Entries
2023-10-10
Petition DENIED.
2023-09-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/6/2023.
2023-09-06
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2023-08-16
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 18, 2023)
Attorneys
United States of America
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Walter Raul Maguina
Erik A. Hanshew — Office of Federal Public Defender (TXWD), Petitioner
Erik A. Hanshew — Office of Federal Public Defender (TXWD), Petitioner