No. 23-5399

Milton Melvin Rodgers v. California

Lower Court: California
Docketed: 2023-08-18
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: civil-rights constitutional-law constitutional-provisions court-procedure criminal-procedure due-process evidence jurisdictional-issue legal-writ search-and-seizure statutory-provisions
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities
Latest Conference: 2023-10-13
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the trial court erred by admitting evidence taken in violation of the Fourth Amendment and the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED arn Tis Court should ResperkEulyy decide the Bllevaing Ingato getin of laws — Le WheVne the Teal Cuck fod by lating ence tak Nel Nae 208 Reno Coase OF | Aa * Oo in esessior ofa Ercan aid by allowing the Thoseouan ta Queen felthooer abact Weer piste Outed ot Qsrsatl ose bee feels tole ah acing Melons to Heine aod Qiiine’s Testionaty thet TAS oa aan.o.gun did col. Open the doe to the Mudelonof this Eulddnos, Which Alelsslon Walated Enrdence Cade 352 and VANS joner Pues Poncoag, Salts Pursuant t Cth as —Fourteontn hmeadwnent to tee Usted Stakes. Conti dion and the Rrosecy AveMioning ta ekck thie Bde Eilers wos Yrseculscial Eran? . Quel\o Respedk 6, Submitted by: Mi an Kadgers in cope Satis 4 4

Docket Entries

2023-10-16
Petition DENIED.
2023-09-28
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/13/2023.
2023-07-26
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 18, 2023)

Attorneys

Milton Melvin Rodgers
Melvin Melvin Rodgers — Petitioner
Melvin Melvin Rodgers — Petitioner