No. 23-54
Robert Mark Scott v. Forcht Bank, N.A.
Response WaivedRelisted (3)
Tags: circuit-court civil-procedure detrimental-reliance false-testimony loan-officer material-facts material-issues-of-fact promissory-estoppel reliance summary-judgment
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2023-12-08
(distributed 3 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether Summary Judgment is proper where material issues of fact exist?
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED ( 1. Whether Summary Judgment is proper where material issues of fact exist? poe 2. Whether Scott detrimentally relied on any i promise made by and through Forcht Bank’s employee, : ; Chris Jasper? 3. Whether the Circuit Court erred in granting a | Summary Judgment where evidence exists of false ; testimony by a key witness: Forcht loan officer, Mike , Sharp? : 4. Whether the Circuit Court erred in overruling ! Plaintiff's Motion to Reconsider? | . . | |
Docket Entries
2023-12-11
Rehearing DENIED.
2023-12-01
Rescheduled.
2023-12-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/8/2023.
2023-11-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/1/2023.
2023-10-26
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2023-10-02
Petition DENIED.
2023-08-16
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/26/2023.
2023-08-15
Waiver of right of respondent Forcht Bank, N.A. to respond filed.
2023-07-18
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due August 21, 2023)
Attorneys
Forcht Bank, N.A.
M. Thurman Senn — Morgan Pottinger McGarvey, Respondent
M. Thurman Senn — Morgan Pottinger McGarvey, Respondent