In an ECSA and unlawful contact with a trial, does a trial court abuse its OEC 401, 402, 403 discretion by allowing the state to present evidence that the defendant's prior convictions were for rape in the second degree, kidnapping in the first degree, unlawful sexual penetration with a foreign object, and sexual abuse, all involving a minor?

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1) In an ECSA and unlawful contact with a trial, does a trial court abuse its OEC 401, , 402, 403 discretion by allowing the state to present evidence that the defendant’s prior convictions were for rape in the second degree, kidnapping in the first degree, unlawful sexual penetration with a foreign object, and sexual abuse, all involving a minor? 2) Is a sentence of life imprisonment for three counts each of encouraging child sexual abuse (ECSA) 1 and 2 unconstitutionally disproportionate when more serious conduct often receives a lesser sentence, and the prior offenses do not allow an inference that deterrence has failed? , 3) In an ECSA and unlawful contact with a child trial, does a trial Court abuse its 401, 403 and 404 discretion of propensity and non-propensity, by allowing the state to present evidence | that the defendant’s prior convictions were for Rape in the second degree, kidnapping in the | first degree, unlawful sexual penetration with a foreign object in the first degree, and sexual abuse in the first degree, all involving a minor? Be , ™? &