Whether the Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals erred in denying Mr. Jackson-Stith's request for mandamus relief to compel dismissal under a state statute that excludes the idea of discretion

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED The Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals denied Mr. Jackson-Stith relief stating that the petitioner filed for Mandamus relief requesting dismissal under statutory law that excludes the idea of discretion. The commandment under 12 Okl. St. 1083 mandates and compels dismissal after no pleadings or action is taken for over a year, the petitioner has not had a hearing for over five years on this action. Mr. Jackson-Stith also requested a copy of the July 5", 2018 preliminary examination transcripts, on July 28", 2023 Honorable Judge Sharon promoted the welfare of indigent litigants and signed my order for the July 5", 2018 transcripts. Furthermore, the transcripts were not documented and do not exist, this is plain error by the preliminary Judge James Keeley because Keeley overruted APD Marny Hill’s objection for the defendant. The purpose of these transcripts will prove that the petitioner’s prosecution was delayed without jurisdiction and constitutes a treasonable | offense in the state of Oklahoma compelling removal of office under Okla. Const. Art. 15 Sec. 1. The State of Oklahoma and those indemnifying on behalf of the state and Board of County Commissioners’ of Tulsa County shall properly be charged with violation said oath of office, attempting to process petitioner without due and legal process. The abovenamed respondents additionally manufactured interference with intrastate commerce disrupting a state and local business attempting to suppress statutory mandates that exclude the idea of discretion. This vested jurisdiction has the power to prevent injustice and reverse the adversarial treasonable order from the Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals declining jurisdiction without plausible claims to deny petitioner such relief, can this vested jurisdiction send and order to instruct the state to uphold all laws governing the State of Oklahoma that excludes the idea of discretion and compel each official to uphold their solemn Oath of Office to perform all functions, duties, and laws without sale denial, or delay. : The vested jurisdiction of the Supreme Court of the United States has a duty to enforce every inferior court in circumstances that benefits the welfare of all citizens, can this vested jurisdiction send an order granting the relief requested that was previously denied by the OCCA. 2 }