Did the Fourth Circuit err in affirming the district court's rulings

QUESTIONS PRESENTED A. Did the Fourth Circuit err in affirming the ruling of the district Court in which granted "Rule 12(b)(6) motion" of the Respondent against TILA claim by finding the Respondent exempt under inconsistent agency regulation, when the federal statute upon which such regulation implements is "unambiguous" and never at all exempts the Respondent from TILA obligations owed to Petitioner? ‘ B. Did the Fourth Circuit err in affirming the ruling of the district Court in which denied "Rule 60(b)(4) motion" of the Petitioner on ground that federal Courts (apart from this Court) are without power to vacate or review a void state judgment, all characterizing as inconsistent with the holding of the Fifth Circuit? C. Did the Fourth Circuit err’ in affirming the ruling of the district Court in which denied "motion for leave to amend Complaint" to add the "42 U.S.C §1983 claim", on futility and unfair prejudice grounds, even where claim is showing that a writ of eviction was issued outside the statutory period without any notice or hearing, and also showing that the possession judgment for which the writ was enforcing had expired, all leading to entry of Petitioner's private home and destruction of all his personal belongings by Respondent and deputy sheriff, implicating the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments to U.S Constitutions? ane | | . Il.