No. 23-5437
Adedayo Hakeem Sanusi v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: circuit-split due-process fundamental-fairness sentencing-guidelines sophisticated-means substantive-reasonableness upward-variance
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw DueProcess
AdministrativeLaw DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2023-10-06
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Appellant is deprived of Due Process
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether the Appellant is deprived of Due Process and where the district court applies a sophisticated means enhancement based upon reasonings not articulated in the Sentencing Guidelines and where there is a circuit split as to the interpretation and application of the sentencing guidelines as it pertains to the definition of sophisticated means. 2. Whether the Appellant was deprived of Due Process and Fundamental fairness where the district court applies an upwatd variance, making the setence: substantively unreasonable, without articulating !"fact-specific" reasons for the departure. G Li
Docket Entries
2023-10-10
Petition DENIED.
2023-09-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/6/2023.
2023-09-07
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2023-07-11
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 25, 2023)
2023-07-10
Application (23A18) granted by Justice Alito extending the time to file until August 18, 2023.
2023-06-21
Application (23A18) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from July 4, 2023 to August 18, 2023, submitted to Justice Alito.
Attorneys
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent