No. 23-5445
William Bazemore v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: abuse-of-discretion crime-of-violence criminal-procedure district-court factual-findings guilty-plea section-1591 sex-trafficking voluntariness withdrawal
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2023-10-06
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the district court abused its discretion when it denied defendant's motion to withdraw his guilty plea and failed to make factual findings necessary to determine the voluntariness of his plea?
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED , : , : WHETHER THE DISTRICT COURT ABUSED ITS DISCRETION : . WHEN IT DENIED DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO WITHDRAW HIS | GUILTY PLEA AND FAILED TO MAKE FACTUAL FINDINGS NECESSARY TO DETERMINE THE VOLUNTARIES OF HIS PLEA? | | Il | . WHETHER SEX TRAFFICKING UNDER SECTION 1591 QUALIFIES | AS NOT A CRIME OF VIOLENCE? | | | | | . |
Docket Entries
2023-10-10
Petition DENIED.
2023-09-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/6/2023.
2023-09-07
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2023-08-23
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 25, 2023)
2023-08-21
Application (23A150) granted by Justice Sotomayor extending the time to file until September 14, 2023.
2023-08-07
Application (23A150) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from August 15, 2023 to September 14, 2023, submitted to Justice Sotomayor.
Attorneys
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent