Did the District Court conspire to have jurisdiction over Petitioner's Motion for Injunctive Relief?

QUESTIONS PRESENTED e Did the District Court conspire to have jurisdiction over Petitioner’s Motion for Injunctive Relief where, Petitioner sought to file his Motion for Injunctive Relief as an Independent matter and district court clerks made a determination to instead file the motion in conjunction with Petitioner’s pending civil matter under C.A. No. 19-4159 despite Petitioner making it known he was filing it as a separate action? e Whether district court acted outside its jurisdiction in conspiring with Defendants and their attorney Mark Vogin to commit fraud upon the court and intentionally : causing harm to Petitioner through deprivation of a fair trial and the complete elimination of Petitioner’s civil trial to conceal their act to commit fraud upon the court and judicial misconduct. e Whether Respondent attorney Mark Vogin violated the rights of the Public, Petitioner, and the Court in conspiring to commit fraud upon the court with : Respondent Eduardo Robreno to unlawfully gain a benefit derived from their act of submitting perjured testimony through a false affidavit intended to deprive Petitioner of winning his civil lawsuit. 1