No. 23-546

Corporate Management, Incorporated, et al. v. United States, ex rel. James Aldridge, et al.

Lower Court: Fifth Circuit
Docketed: 2023-11-21
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response Waived
Tags: administrative-remedy cms due-process executive-compensation false-claims-act government-investigation materiality medicaid medicare medicare-reimbursement pay-and-chase
Key Terms:
DueProcess
Latest Conference: 2024-01-19
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Where the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services makes payments pursuant to a 'pay and chase' policy, are the certifications of Stone County Hospital, Inc. 'material' to Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Service's payment decisions as required by the False Claims Act?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Where the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) makes payments pursuant to a “pay and chase” policy, are the certifications of Stone County Hospital, Inc. (SCH) “material” to CMS’s payment decisions as required by the False Claims Act (FCA)? 2. Where the Government alleges that Ted and Julie Cain’s salaries are excessive and where those salaries were disclosed annually in cost reports submitted to the Government without objection by the Government, did Defendants knowingly make objectively false claims in seeking reimbursement for those disclosed and accepted salaries? 3. When the Government pursues recovery for allegedly “unreasonable” salary claims by bypassing Medicare’s administrative process and brings a FCA action in lieu of the statutory administrative remedy, is the Congressionally established administrative remedy the exclusive remedy for recovery of CMS overpayments? 4. Does the FCA’s “good cause” requirement for extensions of the election period allow the Government to obtain 18 sealed extensions and conduct a secret investigation for 8 years before intervening, where the reasons for the extensions have never been disclosed, constitute overreaching action by the Government in violation of due process, and permit dismissal of the complaint as a sanction?

Docket Entries

2024-01-22
Petition DENIED.
2024-01-03
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/19/2024.
2023-12-14
Waiver of right of respondent James Aldridge to respond filed.
2023-11-30
Waiver of right of respondent U.S., ex rel, James Aldridge, et al. to respond filed.
2023-11-17
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 21, 2023)

Attorneys

Corporate Management, Incorporated, a Mississippi corporation (CMI), et al.
William Lee Guice IIIRushing & Guice, PLLC, Petitioner
William Lee Guice IIIRushing & Guice, PLLC, Petitioner
James Aldridge
John Frederick HawkinsHawkins Law, P.C., Respondent
John Frederick HawkinsHawkins Law, P.C., Respondent
U.S., ex rel, James Aldridge, et al.
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent