Clinton D. Johnson, Jr., aka Kayzon Ru v. Sgt. Johnson, et al.
Was excessive force used during an arrest and detention at a detention center?
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED . . | Was excessive Pagee used chest arrest and retards at detention cenrert Was she sedgenenr ™ etror and Hes? a Was the Nonorable Sheowm A Lyden's J velgemeny in eCror thee xh ex | IN€exerwsable. Neglect) Of miscondver2 HP & cvsah € negheery | Was the Plainri®s Post Amend ment, Powerth Amencenoy, Sixth Amend meny and | Po urteench Avend ment might's Viclazed 2 | : | . Was the Plains tights vislated ancl Gvareented by the ALU PP4 ancl whe | cle tension Cenver 3°94 agesney the Aw od WOO 2 Did the Ommia tien oo Mer ows Ahedes Oireeres iBT Rerrben Long Derentivn enn ) Te aT mung and Wis 0 Peer e\ BAM ss i0n thay Me OMtey Douglas Jehnson Ss exhavsted his aie¥enes ov ecrthe Tedgenenr 2 : Ts jof recenidly was Walhalla, 3.0.3 Anderson, SCs Oconee Covmy, SC} WMese covnsies listedia she iMdEXAS COUNTIES Lolth Norey Counce And P . So, wars The Testimony oP ATT h ney Yoo Aeense , Po¢ Greg VENCAT het Pla tnal No leayey \aved 9 Novey Counsy ond where Dore Net in dang er a plain error evi Peron dously Yovlred gon We ovTeone 99 Proceedings SD lenpriery heb yraming Srdecg \ Heuld the. Povedh Cees Coupet jheve fevfewect anh Oceep Fed the Nooeea\ Was Souq Corral nats, Reliyoust ceedon Nez Prorec tions viclared 2 War zhe Dogt Amend Menr’s Equal Protec igs and Estab shear Clause preFeetions viclered 2 n ’ . — fe . ? Nas the. \eetecn India Preligrus Preedlos hex oe 197& pfoTections Vielareel 2 . nN ‘ \ 42 Was the Phntils eid Prighes Vislated * . Anerican Fad ea Having whe Ldhole Jacldlenr eTact To Prateh come abowr Fron Retyorrs Preadn her uP 1978 beans, exe edsad , Fo are Plain? eatisted to Mane ran, Pune | Nomnel and LOM Pensa Tay Danage eeliel’s.