No. 23-5469
Peonte Shamar Spencer v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appellate-review civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-law constitutional-provisions criminal-sentencing due-process fourth-circuit hobbs-act standing statutory-interpretation violent-conduct
Key Terms:
Immigration
Immigration
Latest Conference:
2023-10-06
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Question not identified
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
No question identified. : | Qu. stves's es sgt _ | 1) Whether this court's wae fo as a rele? be ion fir Concdusron that fe: t made _-+he eat showin of dea na, tot het Hae eli Tia —_———i prsceducal culire is debatabl 2 feeealalie — “ Se “ease ae — —_ gett | 2) letlac His covst's decision ts deny ae, Spence, palte® lnced on theie cenclusion that be has not meade Hee : ould dr A 2 MiSs _ 7 asses! nerd of g On uchonet — a | a _ | | | | _ il | | OL ST_OF Paetes Cee pose. A Lisl A Li of all pacties to the. peeceect um in the Cosi hese Judlecmend is tha subject of this pelvis is.as fellas s
Docket Entries
2023-10-10
Petition DENIED.
2023-09-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/6/2023.
2023-09-08
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2023-08-21
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 28, 2023)
Attorneys
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent