No. 23-5478
Bradley Monical v. Jeremy M. Nofziger, et al.
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-procedure constitutional-provisions due-process foundational-facts standing statutory-provisions
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity DueProcess JusticiabilityDoctri
SocialSecurity DueProcess JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2023-10-06
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the lower court erred in its application of the relevant constitutional and statutory provisions governing the case
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
No question identified. : y ‘
Docket Entries
2023-10-10
Petition DENIED.
2023-09-21
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/6/2023.
2023-09-14
Waiver of right of respondent Jeremy M. Nofziger, et al. to respond filed.
2023-08-25
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 29, 2023)
Attorneys
Bradley Monical
Bradley William Monical — Petitioner
Jeremy M. Nofziger, et al.
Benjamin Noah Gutman — Oregon Department of Justice, Respondent