The Appellate Court erred in denying relief for IOC concerning the advice that petitioner would receive a life sentence after either a guilty plea or a trail guilty verdict

QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW ISSUE 1: The Appellate Court erred in denying relief for IOC concerning the advice that petitioner would receive a life sentence after either a guilty plea or a trail guilty verdict. ISSUE TWO: The Appellate Court erred in denying relief for Ioc for failure to object to the prejudicial text messages and references to uncharged conduct between petitioner and the codefendant Tara Jo Moore. ISSUE THREE: The Appellate Court erred in denying relief for IOC concerning failure to move for a judgment of acquittal as to counts 1, 2 and 3 of the second superseding indictment on grounds that the enticement element proof failed and, the evidence from dismissed counts 4, 5 and 6 was unduly prejudicial against petitioner as to counts 1, 2 and 3. ISSUE FOUR: The Appellate Court erred in denying relief for Petitioner’s request for recusal of the district court due to the courts on the record statements regarding petitioner. 3 PrefixIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES OCTOBER TERM, 2022 DONTAVIOUS BLAKE, PETITIONER, vs. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, RESPONDENT. PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT The Petitioner, DONTAVIOUS BLAKE, respectfully prays that a writ of certiorari issue to review the judgmentorder of the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit entered on April 10, 23 Case No. 22-12379; Southern District of Florida Case Number 19-cv-80523-KAM-1; 13-cr-80054-KAM).