No. 23-5486
Gilberto Gonzalez-Gonzalez v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: burden-shifting carella-v-california criminal-trial due-process francis-v-franklin joint-possession jury-instructions legal-precedent mandatory-presumptions
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2023-10-06
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether jury instructions on joint possession violated due process
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether, after Francis v. Franklin, 471 U.S. 307 (1985) and Carella v. California, 491 U.S. 263 (1989), the burden-shifting jury instructions on joint possession, given at the petitioner’s trial, violated due process. i INTERESTED PARTIES All parties appear in the caption of the case on the cover page.
Docket Entries
2023-10-10
Petition DENIED.
2023-09-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/6/2023.
2023-09-08
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2023-08-25
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 29, 2023)
Attorneys
Gilberto Gonzalez-Gonzalez
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent