Whether the Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals' review of trial courts decisions to admit or exclude expert testimony comport with the United States Supreme Court's decisions in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Kumho Tire Co., Ltd. v. Carmichael

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether the Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals’ review of trial courts decisions to admit or exclude expert testimony comport with the United States Supreme Court’s decisions in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 509, U.S. 579, 113 S. Ct. 2786, 2795, 125 L. Ed. 2d 469 (1993) and Kumho Tire Co., Ltd. v. Carmichael, 526 U.S. 137, 152, . 119 S. Ct. 1167, 143 L. Ed. 2d 238 (1999). 2. Whether the Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals’ legal analysis regarding ineffective assistance of appellate counsel claims comport with the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 1048S. Ct. 2052, 80 L. Ed. 2d 674 (1984). ++ Nothing Follows «++ | | | re : to. .