No. 23-5496

Jensen Ken Alexander v. Joseph Ely, et al.

Lower Court: Fourth Circuit
Docketed: 2023-08-31
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-rights constitutional-law due-process equal-protection federal-jurisdiction legal-procedure prison-conditions retaliation statutory-interpretation transfer
Latest Conference: 2023-10-27
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the petitioner's constitutional rights to equal protection and due process under the Fourteenth Amendment are being violated by the government's alleged discriminatory treatment in transferring him to a higher security prison without justification

Question Presented (from Petition)

No question identified. : oese thei wel bees A Low bibrarY, No USAR ; AMUSE Tensen Sith hare Maysical Acwess Yo A Law Liptay ON & Oy MESES VE Yo ke USNT caVs Com bavi ean here inf lallens Ride ND Den Sent is Virceading Pose on more Than 5 cases in the court SING, desi NC MAME. enrsead W-VaoeeAT any isnt Ais Sctuehon BR wiclaton OF Tewseny et NUM AGEMS ~ Redkess “Govscmenst Griwances ? ‘Jensen is fh USNT mere Hoa utes ‘rrascteccad to VireiniA Peison(s) tw AecL. of Oi30 LENsen WAS AansteCed from Me USWT Feisow wich is A lode 2/3 Mina Son ey NIGUNVA Sodecmar Ki SoulS) Ulnch aie Ledel S Kisdas, Vite; ‘Weates dat R Tossed in Level 243,004 Kigonts ace ancl dranseecced Ay LeveL S SRACMAX Pi sons 2m owida oF Ulellens RLAGe WE Aned haya cooler A. Sertous swWerthoy, onal charee Yak \s Wer SES. TE USAT wmeles ae fy be Arerkod vara Cake Viren ds “Weekes "sqhb BASEN SurOSe AB be AANsKeved Gol H Level. 2/3 mmasonen WSo% to ft Lye 5 SRKMAK Keison onl VE he cauclet A Sriwss dwsthWiadal chawe io Sees ? Ne catsup ah wen we 8S 7 gud He dtterenrt GEKA ESAT WmdOS comic? do UXGA INMALS VSN eed By Violen E <p con CAPCITY RAGS Ao eOal ReteeXon OF Hh Lows 7 + A Mialetion GF Meusext ITE ANGINA Yi son OCF Cis ace COTOSING +t ATGNSRRE Zensen Yo 1 Ort PAWS Arak Yael will wl Asker eaasen koh Lowe veh eisan inte {ison 2H OFS Sentence Gos WE Wate o€ Ane Come he iS IN Rysen Fos eb tece & NNGinWA MAES wn Le Same OC Simi ChacceS ag Nene peak dy bee anette gore, Mallenss ace a peye 4 pfisens ont his secon) of Son OFF OMS a Y/N ye BK Lou RL Pei sds Wid lakion} : WEADMONT KiGHks Av edval Veoteckion oF he Laws 7 ins vi Ween Ae PC VoD CLOLd Down W LONE OF ZIT beeauSe Lhe Geoomins Policy a Dodehed Wave ooGS H WSACE ake waned EAN eNCLRaR On AANIBIZA who VS NOY W\ Cle ko be Acamareted to A Lawelh 4 W eons Yo be Awenstec(ed ano \GUDR Noo laye A We Ck LEASt WR NOK chase Hee ullrich ehwlin was wot one VA CAG Wee OK ANG AMVs TRS LIAS Ard Yeats anod Awe MONAS charter RR AND Was wot Tran<eecced Ao ® LeveL 4 Rereond p EAM IHS ok OME YLOT chacbe £2 ave WAS AcaneGecced Lo Keen Mootinin td =o) o& 2O\4e, Tone Anis SEMAN AND ANoLakion OF Kemsen UW Amenonenk RIGS Lo eval WEAN 9€ AWE Lasts onde he US consi ukion 7 y ARNsenr \s heinG RRR AN Level S SOR MOK RASON Foo No REASON any AS SRITV CASKT CATON PMS is 75 POUKS otkidh is & Levet. 3. wht is NSE bens Mert hoosed ie WLS Sogermar Rison WIRY okher inmates SW Aw, SAM oF Similar charGes axe bene AwanSeexe & bo Lower Level CSpNS IST AMS BV olakion oF Zend send uit Rrennmint RGIS to Ava Roiekion ve Ae Laws 7 ~

Docket Entries

2023-10-30
Petition DENIED.
2023-10-05
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/27/2023.
2023-10-02
Waiver of right of respondent Joseph Ely, et al. to respond filed.
2023-08-22
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 2, 2023)

Attorneys

Jensen K. Alexander
Jensen Ken Alexander — Petitioner
Jensen Ken Alexander — Petitioner
Joseph Ely, et al.
Andrew Nathan FergusonOffice of the Attorney General, Respondent
Andrew Nathan FergusonOffice of the Attorney General, Respondent