Alex Adams v. Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Whether the petitioner's constitutional rights were violated
No question identified. : A VS Mov Ines EUGENE! per PRESENTED tS or \ NENG ME bo MN SY TET 1 DCO Not HEM? DEINE Ar ASL TETUL THE TOR ZIM TIRCAL Posewron's step TEST DONE PROF L cohMaITEO THESE CROWES j IN 20t7 TEXAS BUA: abe paso, RELEASE CATE eter THATS HAUG ALREADY FORWARD BY FeRsT WRG LT STBTES "ALL Tet ow po Vor LENE We To TNESE AME S THSNew EULDEMLE 2 “ ELAMgLE OF! 2, Seoul THENE WAVE BEEN OME TIMCAL LusTAp oF [es BE EUDELMGNT EN TEAD OF Tuo _ A. sould WUT AbMas CEN AUoulep Te Terr witow Co was Wor PRESTNT 2 5. PoES Mot Stace NED Tus (OMPLATM M6 WIT VESS Te ETA FOrMENT & see TRAY PENAL CORE" y. The Tee Dep wor HON ERNEST Bloom rE CowPe sta", Ts , THAT [Wot AME ENDOEWLE Als» OTHER AULA WRTTIVESY, 7 uo sHOt ME : 9g, WHO Faléen Pir ror THE Con PRESTAITE) At TREAL'S 4 WHY Was GU # ACL ¢ CTATEACUT ST WEINELD AWD MOT (LE SEMrEO At TUEALE c| i vsEWUTOR S & DEFENSE AT T(ONVETS ty Cit Holo EMeuc?