Did the District Court commit error that substantively violated Lakes' right when it failed to include the disputes of the objection to the PSR which is to be included in the FBOP files

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Did the District Court commit "error" that substantively : . —wiolated Lakes' right when it failed.to enclude the disputes .. . : of the objection to the PRS which is to be encluded in the FBOP files; This file states that the PSR was adopted without change. This designation, in turn causes the BOP to classify Lakes as a violent offender, increase his residivism risk assessment sheet, and affect his ability to program and reduce the amount of time incarcerated. Was the over-ruling of Lakes' objection to the firearm enhancement a "harmless error" that violated Lakes' rights? When the District Court adopted the PSR without change, and didinot append a copy of the "statement of reasons" addressing «=. the objections and it's effect on the sentence imposed, was this a violation of Federal Rules of Criminal Procudure 32?