Did the District Court commit "error" that substantively
—violated Lakes' right when it failed to enclude the disputes
of the objection to the PRS which is to be encluded in the FBOP
files; This file states that the PSR was adopted without change.
This designation, in turn causes the BOP to classify Lakes as a
violent offender, increase his residivism risk assessment sheet,
and affect his ability to program and reduce the amount of time
incarcerated .

Was the over-ruling of Lakes' objection to the firearm
rights? enhancement a "harmless error" that violated Lakes

When the District Court adopted the PSR without change, and
didinot append a copy of the "statement of reasons" addressing t
the objections and it's effect on the sentence imposed, was this
a violation of Federal Rules of Criminal Procudure 32?

Did the District Court commit error that substantively violated Lakes' right when it failed to include the disputes of the objection to the PSR which is to be included in the FBOP files