Was it constitutional to deny the right of an interpreter because of bilateral sensorineural hearing loss?

QUESTIONS PRESENTED | | | Was it constitutional to deny the right of an interpreter because of bilateral | sensorineural hearing loss? | Was it constitutional toe deny the right of access to medical care and services by not informing, providing, or transferring to a level one trauma center when loss | | of life and limb was known? | Was it constitutional to use the word “RETARD” when referring to Tamara Sue Harbec as a patient in a life or death situation, and did Tamara Sue Harbec receive adequate testing to assess and diagnose at onset to receive proper care and obtain an expert? Will Tamara Sue Harbec suffered damage and harm from the decision of the lower courts based on incorrect information, with no inquiry or investigation? Will Tamara Sue Harbec continue to suffer undue harm and substantial risk of dying without redress? | LIST OF. PARTIES “ { ] All parties appear in the caption of the case on the cover page. [X] All parties do not appear in the caption of the case on the cover page. A list of All