Adelfo Rodriguez-Mendez v. United States
DueProcess FifthAmendment
Whether attributing drugs post-conviction in an amount greater than what is charged in an indictment and greater than what the jury found is in violation of Alleyne-v-United-States, due-process, sixth-amendment, sentencing
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether attributing drugs, post-conviction, in an amount greater than what is charged in an indictment and greater than what the jury found is in violation of Alleyne v. United States, 570 U.S. 99 (2013)? 2. Whether attributing drugs post-conviction, in an amount greater than what is charged in an indictment and greater than what the jury found is in violation of the Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution? 3. Whether surreptitiously obtained audio recordings made by a confidential informant at the direction of the police for the purpose of gathering incriminating evidence that will be used in trial are testimonial in nature, and thus, under the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution, cannot be admitted into evidence without the confidential informant’s presence in court? 4. Whether an unsigned arrest warrant violates Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 9 and constitutes a substantial violation of the Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution’s right to be free of unlawful seizures? 1