No. 23-5535
Michael Rocky Lane v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: brady-claim brady-rule circuit-split clear-and-convincing-evidence criminal-procedure due-process evidence-standard federal-jurisdiction federal-law habeas-corpus statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2023-10-06
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the circuit courts have decided an important question of federal law that should be definitively settled by this court?
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED I. Whether The Circuit Courts Have Decided An Important Question Of Federal Law That Should Be Definitively Settled By This Court? I. Whether 28 U.S.C. § 2255(h)’s ‘Clear & Convincing Evidence’ Standard Should Not Apply To Mr. Lane’s Brady Claim & Others Like It? I. If 28 U.S.C. § 2255(h)’s “Clear And Convincing Evidence” Standard Applies, Whether Mr. Lane’s Claims Meet That Standard? 2
Docket Entries
2023-10-10
Petition DENIED.
2023-09-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/6/2023.
2023-09-11
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2023-08-29
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 6, 2023)
Attorneys
Michael Rocky Lane
Florence M. Bruemmer — Law Office of Florence M. Bruemmer, P.C., Petitioner
Florence M. Bruemmer — Law Office of Florence M. Bruemmer, P.C., Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent