No. 23-5543

Ahmad Jamaleddin Aljindi v. United States

Lower Court: Federal Circuit
Docketed: 2023-09-07
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: constitutional-violation deprivation-of-rights discrimination due-process federal-courts forgery hate-crimes judicial-misconduct obstruction-of-justice retaliation un-charter
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference: 2023-10-27
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Did the United States Federal Government violate the United States Constitution and the Charter of the United Nations when the corrupt Chief Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit insulted and retaliated against the Petitioner for exposing her corruption?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED 1. Did the United States Federal Government (FG) violate the United States Constitution and the Charter of the United Nations (UN) when the corrupt Chief Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit Chief Judge Kimberly A. | Moore called the Petitioner and insulted and called him “F***ing-Muslim” because he exposed her corruption as formally documented in Supreme Court Case # 22-5670 and lower court dockets and filed formal Judicial Misconduct complaints against her and against all other judges in lower courts as she conceded the illegal coordination to obstruct justice and conceded deprivation of rights under color of law as she conceded that she abused the prior 2 appeals 22-1118 & 22-1118 in addition to the third appeal 231230 and coordinated secretly and illegally with the corrupt government attorneys (Igor Helman & his corrupt superiors) after those attorneys did the same manipulations in the lower Court before the appeals in the U.S. Court for Federal Claims, and threatened him with retaliation and to fabricate false charges against him if he challenges and exposes the corruption again? 2. Did the United States Federal Government (FG) violate the United States Constitution and the Charter of the United Nations (UN) when the radical “alt-right” and corrupt Judge Stephen S. Schwartz escalated the radically extreme hate crimes and the deprivation of rights under color of law and retaliated because I exposed his wrongdoing in Supreme Court Case # 21-6181 and 22-5670 and committed a formally documented FORGERY CRIME in Case # 1:21-cv-01295-SSS after the remand as he intentionally altered and changed the Motion to Disqualify him to a so-called Motion to Transfer case and passed it to the Chief Judge to deny it illegally and to cover his formally documented hate crimes? 3. Did the United States Federal Government (FG) violate the United States Constitution and the Charter of the United Nations (UN) when the “so-called” Justices of the Supreme Court of the United States abused the prior Supreme Court Cases 19-7708, 21-6181, 22-5670, and will abuse this Supreme Court Case as well because it challenges and exposes their formally documented and exposed corruption? \ 4. Did the United States Federal Government (FG) violate the United States Constitution and the Charter of the United Nations (UN) when the “so-called” judicial branch is granting Constitutional Relief for people suing because a hot piece of chicken nugget burned the skin of a little girl, the size of the portion of the beef patty of Burger King’s Sandwich is not like the picture, in addition to too many other frivolous lawsuit cases but not serious cases that exposes the scandalous corruption in the judicial branch and its declined integrity that impacts the American People and the United States? 5. Did the United States Federal Government (FG) violate the United States Constitution and the Charter of the United Nations (UN) when the “so-called” Department of Justice (DOJ) is suing for employment discrimination violations by Tesla against refugees and non-citizens applicants for employment while the same DOJ is obstructing justice intentionally and maliciously since 2018 and abused the 17 related cases listed below because they want to steal the $65.4 Million Constitutional Relief from the United States Citizen Petitioner for the same cause of action because the DOJ and other Federal Agencies are Defendants?

Docket Entries

2023-10-30
Petition DENIED.
2023-10-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/27/2023.
2023-10-05
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2023-09-02
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 10, 2023)

Attorneys

Ahmad Aljindi
Ahmad Jamaleddin Aljindi — Petitioner
Ahmad Jamaleddin Aljindi — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent