No. 23-5565
William E. Wells, III v. Florida
IFP
Tags: aggravating-factors apprendi-v-new-jersey capital-sentencing death-penalty due-process eighth-amendment mental-illness proportionality-review
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw DueProcess Punishment
AdministrativeLaw DueProcess Punishment
Latest Conference:
2023-11-03
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether Florida's capital sentencing scheme violates the Eighth Amendment
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
question presented in this case is whether, considering the operation and effect of Florida’s capital sentencing scheme, the Due Process Clause requires those additional determinations to be made beyond a reasonable doubt before the sentencer can choose to impose the death penalty, pursuant to Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 476-85, 490, 494 n.19 (2000) and Ring v. Arizona, 536 U.S. 584, 603-05, 609 (2002). Il. Whether the Eighth Amendment precludes execution of the seriously mentally ill. i STATEMENT OF
Docket Entries
2023-11-06
Petition DENIED.
2023-10-19
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/3/2023.
2023-10-13
Reply of petitioner William E. Wells, III filed.
2023-10-02
Brief of respondent Florida in opposition filed.
2023-09-11
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 13, 2023)
Attorneys
State of Florida
William E. Wells, III