No. 23-5565

William E. Wells, III v. Florida

Lower Court: Florida
Docketed: 2023-09-13
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: aggravating-factors apprendi-v-new-jersey capital-sentencing death-penalty due-process eighth-amendment mental-illness proportionality-review
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw DueProcess Punishment
Latest Conference: 2023-11-03
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether Florida's capital sentencing scheme violates the Eighth Amendment

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

question presented in this case is whether, considering the operation and effect of Florida’s capital sentencing scheme, the Due Process Clause requires those additional determinations to be made beyond a reasonable doubt before the sentencer can choose to impose the death penalty, pursuant to Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 476-85, 490, 494 n.19 (2000) and Ring v. Arizona, 536 U.S. 584, 603-05, 609 (2002). Il. Whether the Eighth Amendment precludes execution of the seriously mentally ill. i STATEMENT OF

Docket Entries

2023-11-06
Petition DENIED.
2023-10-19
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/3/2023.
2023-10-13
Reply of petitioner William E. Wells, III filed.
2023-10-02
Brief of respondent Florida in opposition filed.
2023-09-11
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 13, 2023)

Attorneys

State of Florida
Carla Suzanne BechardOffice of the Attorney General, State of Florida, Respondent
Carla Suzanne BechardOffice of the Attorney General, State of Florida, Respondent
William E. Wells, III
Barbara Jane BusharisPublic Defender's Office, Second Judicial Circuit, Petitioner
Barbara Jane BusharisPublic Defender's Office, Second Judicial Circuit, Petitioner