Whether the 6th Circuit's order departed from Houston v. Lack and Evitts v. Lucy

QUESTIONS PRESENTED I.) WHETHER THE 6% CIRCUIT’S ORDER SO FAR DEPARTED FROM HOUSTON V. LACK AND EVITTS V. LUCY, REQUIRING THIS COURT’S SUPERVISORY POWERS TO PROTECT THE INTEGRITY, IMPARTIALITY, AND OVERALL FAIRNESS OF THE AMERICAN ; CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM? II.) WHETHER CONFUSION IN THE U.S. COURTS OF APPEALS ON THE XIVTH AMEND.’S RIGHT TO A SPEEDY APPEAL NEEDS UNIFORMITY, AND IF SO, DID THE 12 YEARS OF INORDINATE APPELLATE DELAY PREJUDICE PETITIONER'S XIVTH AMEND. -DUE PROCESS AND EQUAL PROTECTION CLAUSE SPEEDY APPEAL RIGHTS? ii PARTIES TO PROCEEDINGS & OPINIONS In the District Court, Jason Clendenion was the Respondent, the Petitioner was named as: Petitioner. In the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, Petitioner was named as: and Jason Clendenion as: In the Supreme Court of Tennessee, Petitioner was known as Petitioner, and the State of Tennessee was known as Appellee. . Pleasant-Bey V. Clendenion, 2:19-cv-02136, . U.S. District Court for the Western District of Tennessee, Western Division, Judgment entered April 3, 2023. ° Pleasant-Bey V. Clendenion, No. 23-5347, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit. Judgment entered July 11, 2023 iii