No. 23-5573
Lashun Tracy Tinnen v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: constitutional-rights criminal-procedure defense-counsel habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance legal-precedent performance-evaluation right-to-counsel sixth-amendment strickland-standard strickland-test
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2023-10-06
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Was the defense counsel ineffective under Strickland v. Washington?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW In light of the facts of this case, was the defense counsel ineffective in light of this court’s precedent in Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984)? ii
Docket Entries
2023-10-10
Petition DENIED.
2023-09-21
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/6/2023.
2023-09-18
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2023-08-20
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 13, 2023)
Attorneys
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent