Whether the trial court's denial of the defendant's right to self-representation and effective assistance of counsel constitutes a violation of the Sixth Amendment

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED + CoN cH tricl Judeo preaged in Eccophn lord a the defatens Srnec him of cern es process Where tre coverrment Biled 45 povle expy Andere Ratorse 45 delanse BUlpres FE Cpe5 & Conficeh of Abhonne,-Clact Privileye corshtvte A Wolchas Of Sith Awedment Pf dhe Courh Wes made enere by defrbwl’s Counge| thal he Cen no} Peper Tapresent him baccuse of o, bre, deni? of canmmenicehon( rohan to Widen) ) Wy Wieh Gone DL firsh end Set Secong Wrokan WS Ignored, key TLE LP tre coverment fila fo pevde news Mn dzjomme jurisdichan, con tricl Coue+ Sill Poceed_ WP counsel for defentar raceved tre repork tre dey of dre lheuray vitro Perper noree TW Dees & Nokshen conshivhe Correstian OF Record | WT TP trict Md RileL to Sve prpe> nobiee af comb 9 the Gu Chage, doss SucL\ | Naer (ECEVe paper rohice of Guyse te $4 — Sf YAHE of 49X46 | © Na Bees «. defenent Veve the Nah} to Whhdvey. 7 (ine plan are Cowes bas inch cecapled. Hye} 2