Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether statutes that prescribe a definite term for a federal office, without providing for removal of the officer during the prescribed term, impliedly permit the officer's removal at any time without cause
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether statutes that prescribe a definite term for a federal office, without providing for removal of the officer during the prescribed term, impliedly permit the officer’s removal at any time without cause. 2. Whether courts should defer to the National Labor Relations Board’s view that the agency’s General Counsel has unreviewable authority to withdraw an administrative complaint when a motion for summary judgment has placed the merits before the Board.
2024-07-02
Petition GRANTED. Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED for further consideration in light of <i>Loper Bright Enterprises</i> v. <i>Raimondo</i>, 603 U. S. ___ (2024).
2024-06-28
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 7/1/2024.
2024-02-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/23/2024.
2024-02-07
Reply of petitioners United Natural Foods, Inc., et al. filed. (Distributed)
2024-01-22
Brief of respondent National Labor Relations Board in opposition filed.
2024-01-22
Brief of respondents Teamsters Local 117 and 313 in opposition filed.
2023-12-01
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including January 22, 2024, for all respondents.
2023-11-30
Motion of Teamsters Local 117 and 313 to extend the time to file a response from December 22, 2023 to January 22, 2024, submitted to The Clerk.
2023-11-29
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including January 22, 2024.
2023-11-27
Motion to extend the time to file a response from December 22, 2023 to January 22, 2024, submitted to The Clerk.
2023-11-20
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 22, 2023)