No. 23-5582

Juan Manuel Reyes v. Washington County, Oregon, et al.

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2023-09-14
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: 4th-amendment accrual-of-discovery civil-rights constitutional-rights constructive-notice due-process fourth-amendment governmental-action section-1983 statute-of-limitations
Key Terms:
DueProcess Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2024-03-15 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Does a Fourth Amendment or any other United States Constitutional Amendment violation have a federal expiration date or time limitation other than the relied upon State's 2-year statute of limitation for personal injury claims

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED A.) Does a Fourth Amendment or any other United States Constitutional Amendment violation have a federal expiration date or time limitation other than the relied upon State’s 2-year statute of limitation for personal injury claims from an unlawful or illegal conduct by state government action, by police officers or participating agents, and then claim that the aggrieved is placed on constructive notice at the time of the alleged constitutional violation, Fourth Amendment? The conflict between the decision of the 9" Circuit Court of Appeals, which review is sought, a decision of other circuit court of appeals on the same issue. Petitioner moves the U.S. Supreme Court to resolve the disagreement of the court of appeals about the specific legal question of “constructive notice” and the “accrual of discovery” date. The importance of this question applies to the public’s constitutional rights to file a § 1983 when their Fourth Amendment is violated and protection from being removed from their home when accused of any form of abuse by the Department of Human Services (ODHS) and local police detectives. B.) How is a constructive notice different from an illegal or unlawful governmental act that _ . violates a citizen’s Fourth Amendment right and time-barred after 2-years of the state’s statute of limitation in comparison, for example, the $MeToo movement of women coming forward to allege and sue a male who is a celebrity, government official, justice of the court, former presidents, or any other ordinary man who may have, many years or decades ago, allegedly touched or assaulted a woman without her consent.in a possibly sexual manner? Were these women placed on constructive notice at that time of their claim or when the alleged violation occurred? C.) The federal rule of discovery does not state anything about constructive notice nor time _ limitation, yet state agencies and agents protect themselves with this umbrella when being suit under § 1983 for their wrongful and unlawful conduct. If one district court renders an opinion or ruling on a specific constitutional violation, at what point does an ordinary or common person, citizen, is advised of or told about their constitutional rights and its protection against unlawful or illegal conduct of a state government, agency or agents? Page 3of21 ~~ = SS*S*~<i*=‘é*;*C UM, Reyes #2130253

Docket Entries

2024-03-18
Rehearing DENIED.
2024-02-21
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/15/2024.
2023-12-08
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2023-11-13
Petition DENIED.
2023-10-25
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/9/2023.
2023-09-26
Waiver of right of respondents Cares NW and Cares NW Workers Jane Does to respond filed.
2023-09-22
Waiver of right of respondents City of Beaverton, Beaverton Police Department, BPD Detectives to respond filed.
2023-09-20
Waiver of right of respondent Department of Human Services to respond filed.
2023-07-18
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 16, 2023)

Attorneys

Cares NW and Cares NW Workers Jane Does
Hillary Ann TaylorKeating Jones Hughes, P.C, Respondent
Hillary Ann TaylorKeating Jones Hughes, P.C, Respondent
City of Beaverton, Beaverton Police Department, BPD Detectives
Elizabeth A JonesCapitol Legal Services, Respondent
Elizabeth A JonesCapitol Legal Services, Respondent
Department of Human Services
Benjamin Noah GutmanOregon Department of Justice, Respondent
Benjamin Noah GutmanOregon Department of Justice, Respondent
Juan Manuel Reyes
Juan Manuel Reyes — Petitioner
Juan Manuel Reyes — Petitioner