No. 23-5586
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appellate-review brady-violation circuit-court civil-procedure court-procedure document-submission due-process evidentiary-hearing legal-dismissal petition-process standing subpoena-duces-tecum
Latest Conference:
2023-10-06
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the Eleventh Circuit clerk err in dismissing the petitioner's case after the petitioner provided all requested documents?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED OS ¢ DD THE EIEVeNTH cinwiT clerk Err in Dismissing . | His Coa) AF Ter THE PETITIONeC Provided All . DOCUMENTS REQvested ° . ° Did THE E\EVeNTH Circuit CIERK EM iN Dismissing THE Petitioner Eo A) AE “TE PETITiONer ExpaiNed — _. We RAd No CoNTAOT OF THE DocomeNTS REQueSsTed ? . ~*~ DID THE DistRicl court Err in NOT Holding AN EVidenTiary : HEaring AFTe iT Granted A SUubpeoNA DUCES Tecum . TO THE PETITIONer To INVESTIGATE, A brady Violation ? . : : e. tr |
Docket Entries
2023-10-10
Petition DENIED.
2023-09-21
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/6/2023.
2023-09-19
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2023-04-05
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 16, 2023)
Attorneys
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent