Whether the conviction and/or sentence was in violation of the United States Constitution, Mississippi Constitution, and Laws of Mississippi

No question identified. : QUESTovS PRESENTED © | (1) The Convict on Qnd/or Sentence was in visletion of the United States Constitution, Missi SSippt Constitution, @nd Laws of Mississippi. (2 The Canvictenn and/or Sentence aS 6 Habitual by amending insdetment The dey f Sentencing if in Vieletian Of Miss. R, br, 2 14,1 anid Contrery fo SH decisions vsokating Price V Vincent S33 US O54, ISS cod dd 873, 193 Set 1848 2523). | (3) Imprsper indicimentDoes not hst all elements of Burglary Gnd none of fhe elements df the Under | lying Charge af Larceny F therefore, Not Charging the crime of Burglary violation OF US éonst, 5% Amend. | Gnd Miss, Const, Art3 See, 37_ | (4) Ineffective assistance? af Lynsel in Violation 7 of YS Const, G" 6/4 Amends, , Miss. Const, Art. 3 See. 3% Strickland V Washinoton Yb US £63,% US V_ Cranie Yel US Gt S38, & Harding V Davis £2e Edd 1341, 1345; Con i 1938), (5) There has heen an intervening decision of , the Supreme Csurt, Hughes v State J9/ So3d_ 793030) ’ i luyeh would 6f adversely affected the autcome of the Sentence In Gecordance wrth Mss Code Ann 99-39-5 IAG) and 99-39-8 en Seg. 0 fist OF PARTIES MS Attorney General Ms. éynn Fitch (5 Bex 246 Tatkson,ms 39465 in