No. 23-5609

Eric G. Banks, Sr. v. Anthony Brown, Attorney General of Maryland, et al.

Lower Court: Fourth Circuit
Docketed: 2023-09-19
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 5th-amendment court-error due-process eighth-amendment fifth-amendment fourteenth-amendment ineffective-counsel liberty prosecution-misconduct sixth-amendment
Key Terms:
FifthAmendment HabeasCorpus Punishment
Latest Conference: 2023-11-03
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Did the U.S. District Court violate the Petitioners 5th Amendment Constitutional Right

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

Questions Presented 1.) Did the U.S. District Court violate the Petitioners 5th Amendment Constitutional Right by allowing the lower court to allow the Petitioner to testify against his self and denied freedom and liberty without due process: ineffective counsel, prosecution misconduct and court error. . 2.) Did the U.S. District Court and the Court of Appeals (Fourth Circuit) violate the Petitioners 6th Amendment Constitutional Right of assistance of counsel by not ; granting the Petitioner legal representation after the Petitioners post conviction : hearing, with the Petitioner’s appeal. . 3.) Did the U.S. District Court violate the Petitioners 8th Amendment Constitutional Rights by holding the Petitioner accountable for time of tolling or delay when the : library was close for long periods and when the Petitioner was in need of medical ; attention, as well as quarantine. Which aided in restricted movement. 4.) Did the U.S District Court and the Court of Appeals (Fourth Circuit) violate the ; Petitioners 14th Amendment Constitutional Rights by not granting the Petitioner an . Application of Appealibility, when circumstance was beyond the petitioners control. Y 5.) Is it fair and Constitutionally sound to hold the Petitioner accountable for things Fy beyond the Petitioners control? ; . : Oo

Docket Entries

2023-11-06
Petition DENIED.
2023-10-19
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/3/2023.
2023-10-16
Waiver of right of respondent Brown, Att'y Gen. of MD, et al. to respond filed.
2023-06-30
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 19, 2023)

Attorneys

Brown, Att'y Gen. of MD, et al.
Jeremy Hugh WelterOffice of the Attorney General of Maryland, Respondent
Jeremy Hugh WelterOffice of the Attorney General of Maryland, Respondent
Eric G. Banks
Eric G. Banks Sr. — Petitioner
Eric G. Banks Sr. — Petitioner