No. 23-5618

Gustavo Tijerina Sandoval v. Texas

Lower Court: Texas
Docketed: 2023-09-20
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Relisted (10)IFP
Tags: constitutional-rights criminal-procedure criminal-trial due-process jury-empanelment jury-selection lower-court-split trial-procedure
Key Terms:
DueProcess Punishment Immigration
Latest Conference: 2024-05-09 (distributed 10 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

When does jury empanelment begin for purposes of the due process right to be present?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Given that jury selection is one of the most critical phases of a criminal trial, how should courts determine when jury empanelment begins for a particular defendant’s case, triggering the due process right to be present? 2. Did the state court err when it held, without analysis of the underlying facts, that the trial court did not violate the petitioner’s due process rights when it excluded him and his counsel from proceedings in which members of the jury panel called for his trial—and who knew the case that they were summoned for—sought discretionary excusals from the court? ii

Docket Entries

2024-05-13
Petition DENIED. Justice Jackson, with whom Justice Sotomayor joins, dissenting from the denial of certiorari. (Detached <a href = 'https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/23-5618_7648.pdf'>Opinion</a>)
2024-05-06
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/9/2024.
2024-04-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/26/2024.
2024-04-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/19/2024.
2024-04-12
Electronic record from the Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas received.
2024-04-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/12/2024.
2024-03-25
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/28/2024.
2024-03-19
Record Requested.
2024-03-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/22/2024.
2024-03-11
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/15/2024.
2024-02-26
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/1/2024.
2024-02-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/23/2024.
2024-01-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/16/2024.
2024-01-16
Reply of petitioner Gustavo Tijerina Sandoval filed. (Distributed)
2024-01-04
Brief of respondent Texas in opposition filed.
2023-11-14
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including January 4, 2024.
2023-11-13
Motion to extend the time to file a response from November 20, 2023 to January 4, 2024, submitted to The Clerk.
2023-10-16
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including November 20, 2023.
2023-10-13
Motion to extend the time to file a response from October 20, 2023 to November 20, 2023, submitted to The Clerk.
2023-09-14
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 20, 2023)
2023-07-31
Application (23A80) granted by Justice Alito extending the time to file until September 14, 2023.
2023-07-25
Application (23A80) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from August 15, 2023 to September 14, 2023, submitted to Justice Alito.

Attorneys

Gustavo Tijerina Sandoval
Jennae Rose SwiergulaTexas Defender Service, Petitioner
Jennae Rose SwiergulaTexas Defender Service, Petitioner
Texas
Jefferson David ClendeninOffice of the Attorney General of Texas, Respondent
Jefferson David ClendeninOffice of the Attorney General of Texas, Respondent