Whether the petitioner's constitutional and statutory rights were violated

No question identified. : Guetios Pesenkd (yall Ye, yeurt fsond F obs in VE. Mla Coun Miron Rights oud ena 54 ll | stitatiaal Night OF Cte OWE Teneo Lee te Wel. Cel ond tesfomony 10 he 1 ID otter) fo obsy ye ¢) (lOM, SAPEOIS, O° COIMNL, t€ C, VOW MY Ose). bs, cP gause, he. Pmght se. coull help (aw Onel hough Quay. Only a taotrgl ante _ aatt 10 Whee, sfE_ Opa Cdl 1 SAUL aS prot’ MC, (me clust-shoet 6 finish) Ropes inger Why wns kay eo the She to howe ~~ aa Bendy Yat koa She aw yer Clon Ghose oF He Hess _\Oyol was the, Stoke dle nays (Ashley Searbeughve ___ led oss. Spelling taght be «Mi LE: \Seariyrargn 28. 4 Oho Lot Vi Sait Cy OMEN eth QO vet CLOUDY 5 C0 GIVEN, Of a ee sly cred hak shes. _ behal. Sener ie date an acti —— odwenment nrghe’s ud ator toal deny CONSTITUTIONAL AND STATUTORY PROVISIONS INVOLVED .:-.seeeseseseee Be