No. 23-5638

Adrian M. Jackson v. Clinton Canady, III, Judge, et al.

Lower Court: Sixth Circuit
Docketed: 2023-09-22
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: abuse-of-discretion civil-procedure civil-rights discovery due-process factual-error remand sixth-circuit vacatur
Key Terms:
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference: 2023-11-17
Question Presented (AI Summary)

whether-the-sixth-circuit-abused-its-discretion

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED QUESTON NUMBER ONE: Whether the Sixth Circuit abused its discretion by committing a factual error in which likely impacted the outcome of their Decision, thus, does this justify VACATING and REMANDING their affirmance of the district court’s decision ? QUESTION NUMBER TWO: Whether the Sixth Circuit abused its discretion by affirmance of the district court clearly erred by failing to afford Mr. Jackson an opportunity to pursue discovery and whom discovery have not been answered but was ruled to be moot, thus, does this justify VACATING and REMANDING the Dismissal of Civil Rights Civil Suit ? QUESTION NUMBER THREE: Whether the Sixth Circuit abused its discretion by affirmance of the district court clearly erred by Dismissing Section 1983 Civil Suit Action as a genuine issue as to any material fact existed, thus, does this justify VACATING and REMANDING the Dismissal of Civil Rights Civil Suit and to set the matter for Trial ? ii.

Docket Entries

2023-11-20
Petition DENIED.
2023-11-02
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/17/2023.
2023-09-18
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 23, 2023)

Attorneys

Adrian M. Jackson
Adrian M. Jackson — Petitioner
Adrian M. Jackson — Petitioner