No. 23-5642
Tracy Jones, aka Tracy Wilcox v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: constitutional-law criminal-procedure dismissal due-process fifth-amendment miranda-rights missouri-v-seibert presentment
Key Terms:
DueProcess FifthAmendment CriminalProcedure
DueProcess FifthAmendment CriminalProcedure
Latest Conference:
2023-10-27
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a 37-day delay in presentment requires dismissal under the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW 1) Whether a 37-day delay in presentment requires dismissal under the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment? 2) Whether the use of pre-Mirandized questioning attempting to obtain a waiver of Miranda Rights is permissible under Missouri v. Seibert? i
Docket Entries
2023-10-30
Petition DENIED.
2023-10-05
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/27/2023.
2023-09-27
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2023-09-19
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 23, 2023)
Attorneys
Tracy Jones
Justin Lee Bell — May, Adam, Gerdes & Thompson, LLP, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent