Ineffective-assistance-of-counsel

QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW 1. Did Trial Counsel Fail to Adequately inform Defendant of the Consequences of Accepting the Plea Bargain? 2. Was the Strickland V. Washington standard of review . for ineffective assistance of counsel,Fustrated by the lower Court's failure to notice,objective record evidence, that can satisfy the COA mandate in the defendant's : favor? Was the lower Court's findings based upon clear misinterpretations of the record, and mere speculations, adequate to'deny defendant's motion 2255? 3. Was the defendant deprived Due Process by the lower Court's, when the District Court, and the Circuit Court fail to , notice, Clear record evidence, That will Contradict the Government's witness's testimony? Testimony that will have critical force in the outcome of the case, and it's denial. 4. Has the Circuit Court commited reversable error / or : . manifest error,by not noticing the district court's failure to consider evidence that,will dispute the district Court's findings of fact , when the evidence was presented by the defendant's attorney to the District Court, and then clearly : presented to the Circuit Court on post judgement appeal, and pro se petition by the defendant? 5. Has the Petitioner satisfied the COA mandate, and experienced . Prejudice that will render his Plea Invalid? Was the petitioner provided with Constitutionally Competent advice,by his attorney? . I . 1 , \