No. 23-5647

Eddie Savage v. Chae Harris, Warden

Lower Court: Sixth Circuit
Docketed: 2023-09-26
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: constitutional-rights conviction-relief due-process equal-protection exculpatory-evidence forfeiture fourteenth-amendment photographic-evidence post-conviction-relief
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus Trademark
Latest Conference: 2023-10-27
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Fourteenth Amendment's Due Process Clause is violated when the State presents evidence at trial that is later discovered to be false or misleading, and under what circumstances the use of such evidence may be forfeited and available to the accused to seek relief from the resulting conviction

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

Question presented when the accuse discovers that a photograph and its contents are now not what they were once purported to be at trial, is the fourteenth amendment, equal protection of law or due process clause violated? If so, under what circumstances do the use of the photographs their contents become forfeited from the state’s use and ripe for the use by the accuse to pursue relief from the conviction obtained with its use? : nT Tee . .

Docket Entries

2023-10-30
Petition DENIED.
2023-10-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/27/2023.
2023-10-10
Waiver of right of respondent Chae Harris to respond filed.
2023-09-12
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 26, 2023)

Attorneys

Chae Harris
Michael Jason HendershotOhio Attorney General's Office, Respondent
Eddie Savage
Eddie Savage — Petitioner