No. 23-5649

Jonathan Monson v. United States

Lower Court: First Circuit
Docketed: 2023-09-26
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 18-usc-2251 child-exploitation criminal-law criminal-statute due-process interstate-commerce jurisdictional-element minor-protection sexual-exploitation visual-depiction
Key Terms:
CriminalProcedure JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2023-10-27
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Does Section 2251(a) of Title 18 require evidence that a defendant sexually exploited a minor for the purpose of producing a visual depiction, and that the visual depiction was produced using materials with an interstate-commerce nexus?

Question Presented (from Petition)

QUESTION PRESENTED Section 2251(a) of Title 18 criminalizes the use of a minor to engage in any sexually explicit conduct “for the purpose of producing any visual depiction of such conduct.” The crime also carries a jurisdictional element that requires “that [the] visual depiction was produced or transmitted using materials that have been mailed, shipped, or transported in or affecting interstate or foreign commerce by any means, including by computer.” Does it satisfy this jurisdictional element if there is no evidence that a defendant sexually exploited a minor for the purpose of producing a visual depiction of the exploitation, and that same visual depiction was produced using materials that have an interstate-commerce nexus? 2

Docket Entries

2023-10-30
Petition DENIED.
2023-10-05
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/27/2023.
2023-09-28
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2023-09-22
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 26, 2023)

Attorneys

Jonathan Monson
Jin-Ho KingMilligan Rona Duran & King LLC, Petitioner
Jin-Ho KingMilligan Rona Duran & King LLC, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent