No. 23-5651

Harry J. Williby v. Sergey Brin, et al.

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2023-09-26
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Relisted (2)IFP
Tags: 14th-amendment 28-U.S.C-455(a) district-court due-process judge judicial-ethics recusal section-455 sua-sponte
Latest Conference: 2023-12-08 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)

1. Does a District Court Judge violate a litigant's right to Due Process, Under the 14th Amendment of the United States Constitution, Section I, when the District Court Judge subject to a recusal motion, under 28 U.S.C. § 455(a), subjectively (or personally) rules on the motion?

2. Based upon the Respondents' financial support, campaigning on behalf of President Barack Obama, employment in the Obama/Biden administrations, and the software, computer/Internet technical support provided to President Joe Biden/Barack Obama's campaign(s); and subsequent election(s): Are district court judges required to recuse themselves Sua Sponte, under 28 U.S.C. § 455(a), when the Respondents herein, are plaintiffs, or defendants in the civil action?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Does a District Court Judge violate a litigant's right to Due Process, under the 14th Amendment, when the District Court Judge rules on a recusal motion under 28-U.S.C-455(a)

Docket Entries

2023-12-11
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
2023-12-01
Rescheduled.
2023-12-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/8/2023.
2023-11-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/1/2023.
2023-09-20
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 26, 2023)

Attorneys

Harry J. Williby
Harry J. Williby — Petitioner