No. 23-5668
Maurice Bellamy v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appellate-review constitutional-vagueness count-severance criminal-indictment criminal-procedure cruel-and-unusual-punishment double-jeopardy due-process indictment joinder severance trial-court-discretion
Key Terms:
Arbitration DueProcess
Arbitration DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2023-10-27
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the trial court erred when it denied defendant's repeated motions to sever counts in the indictment
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED |. Whether the trial court erred when it denied defendant's repeated motions to sever counts in the indictment Il. Whether the cruel, heinous and atrocious enhancement is unconstitutionally vague and whether the District of Columbia Court of Appeals incorrectly concluded the issue was not preserved for appellate review
Docket Entries
2023-10-30
Petition DENIED.
2023-10-05
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/27/2023.
2023-10-02
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2023-09-25
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 30, 2023)
Attorneys
Maurice Bellamy
Steven R. Kiersh — Petitioner
UnIted States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent