No. 23-567
Superior Well Services, Inc. v. American Home Assurance Company, et al.
Response Waived
Tags: commercial-general-liability commercial-liability faulty-workmanship federalism insurance-law occurrence state-law third-circuit
Key Terms:
Privacy Jurisdiction
Privacy Jurisdiction
Latest Conference:
2024-01-19
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Third Circuit's decision below violated core principles of federalism by rewriting Pennsylvania state insurance law
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether the Third Circuit’s decision below violated core principles of federalism by rewriting Pennsylvania state insurance law _ regarding application of the “faulty workmanship” doctrine in insurance coverage disputes. 2. Whether unexpected damage to nondefective property caused by an insured’s poor workmanship constitutes an “occurrence” under an occurrencebased commercial general liability insurance policy.
Docket Entries
2024-01-22
Petition DENIED.
2024-01-03
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/19/2024.
2023-12-19
Waiver of right of respondent U.S. Energy Development Corporation to respond filed.
2023-12-07
Waiver of right of respondent American Home Assurance Company to respond filed.
2023-11-21
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 27, 2023)
2023-10-18
Application (23A352) granted by Justice Alito extending the time to file until November 22, 2023.
2023-10-12
Application (23A352) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from October 23, 2023 to November 22, 2023, submitted to Justice Alito.
Attorneys
American Home Assurance Company
Robert Reeves Anderson — Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP, Respondent
Robert Reeves Anderson — Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP, Respondent
Superior Well Services, Inc.
Michael G Connelly — Troutman Pepper Hamilton Sanders LLP, Petitioner
Michael G Connelly — Troutman Pepper Hamilton Sanders LLP, Petitioner
U.S. Energy Development Corporation
William A. Ciszewski III — Hodgson Russ LLP, Respondent
William A. Ciszewski III — Hodgson Russ LLP, Respondent