Whether the district court's resolution of the petitioner's Fifth Amendment due process claim was correct, given the government's multiple breaches of conduct and the harmless error standard

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED a, . . Z.. Gould jurists of reason debate the district court's resolution, ‘ . ‘or conclude the issue presented is adequate to:deserve “encourage7 ‘to proceed further, with respect to the denial of Petitioner's ots Fifth Amendment right to due process where the district court . : : : “found the government committed multiple breaches of Co OC eo bat had found the _ errors harmless under the standard set forth in Kotteakos v. . ‘United States, 328-U-S. 750 (1946)? ; Suggested Answer: Yes. 7 . : II. Is a Sixth Amendment claim of denial of counsel of choice ; ; subject to procedural default where the trial court fails to : ; hold a hearing on the issue prior to the denial? — ; . Suggested Answer: No. ; . ; III. Where the Court of Appeals .coriceded that the record was not developed as to the reason why: the trial court denied Petitioner a his right to his chosen counsel, was it error for.said Court of : Appeals to find that Petitioner procedurally. defaulted his Sixth _ Amendment claim of denial of counsel of choice? oo [x All parties appear in the caption of the case on the cover page. ' 7 ‘[ ] All parties do net appear in the.caption of the case on the cover page. Alistof °° all