Whether the Sixth Circuit's threshold for extraordinary and compelling reasons under the First Step Act of 2018 Compassionate Release is erroneous and overly searching and violates the law given to the District Court judges' discretion explained in Concepcion v. United States, 142 S. Ct. 2364 (2022)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED ) WWaerace tHe Socn Crecurt’s THREsHolo FoR EXTRAURDINARY AND COMPELLING REASONS UNDER THE Faest Step Act of 2018 ComPasSonate RKecease IS ERRONEOUS AND OVERLY SEARCHING AND VIOLATES THE LAW Savén To THE Dzstaxcz Courr Junges DISCRETION ExpiaINeD IN Coneerrzon v. Uwrten Staves, 142 S. Cx 2364 (202), 2) Waetner tHe QBoan Sct AMONG CouRTS OF APPEALS REgRROTNG , WHETHE IZ A SENTENCING DZSPARLTY CREATED BY NONRETROACTIVE CHANGES TO A MANDATORY SENTENCING SCHEME CAN ConSTITUTE AN EXTRAORDINARY AND ComPEuIng REASON” To GRANT COMPASS TONATE RELEASE UNDER 1B USC. § 3sB2@DEN) DENYING PETITZONER'S BORN 02 ZNDICTED) IN THE DZSTRICT Crecurts THAT say“ No’ E Qual PROTECTIDN THAT OTHER Mue “a PETZTZONERS ARE RECEIVING IN THE CrRcuITS THAT SAY “YES. 3) WuetHer tue Stem Careurr's reversac or A Desreser Sua’ OLSCRETZONAL “OECZSI0N To FIX A UWCONSZTUTZONAL SENTENCE MADE RY THE CouRTS AND THE OFFICER(S) OF THE CouRrT THROUGH THE COMPASSION RELEASE STATUK TS CLERRUT ERLOME OUS ANO WRRLAWTS FURTHER WEVZEW BY THES CourTS, -I