No. 23-5702

Ian A. Milaski v. Florida

Lower Court: Florida
Docketed: 2023-10-03
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Relisted (2)IFP Experienced Counsel
Tags: arbitrary-and-unreasonable continuance counsel-of-choice criminal-procedure due-process right-to-counsel sixth-amendment trial-court
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw DueProcess
Latest Conference: 2023-12-08 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the trial court's arbitrary and unreasonable denial of a continuance violated the Petitioner's Sixth Amendment rights

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Whether the trial court’s arbitrary and unreasonable denial of a continuance (.e., “I have full confidence in [current defense counsel’s] ability to try this case competently[, a]s you know, he’s my former law partner[, so ]I’m going to keep this on the trial docket”) — which denied the Petitioner counsel of his choice — violated the Petitioner’s Sixth Amendment rights. il B. PARTIES INVOLVED The parties involved are identified in the style of the case. iii

Docket Entries

2023-12-11
Petition DENIED.
2023-12-01
Rescheduled.
2023-12-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/8/2023.
2023-11-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/1/2023.
2023-09-18
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 2, 2023)
2023-09-05
Application (23A48) granted by Justice Thomas extending the time to file until September 18, 2023.
2023-08-31
Application (23A48) to extend further the time from September 7, 2023 to September 18, 2023, submitted to Justice Thomas.
2023-07-20
Application (23A48) granted by Justice Thomas extending the time to file until September 7, 2023.
2023-07-10
Application (23A48) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from August 8, 2023 to September 7, 2023, submitted to Justice Thomas.

Attorneys

Ian A. Milaski
Michael Robert UffermanMichael Ufferman Law Firm, P.A., Petitioner
Michael Robert UffermanMichael Ufferman Law Firm, P.A., Petitioner