No. 23-5702
Tags: arbitrary-and-unreasonable continuance counsel-of-choice criminal-procedure due-process right-to-counsel sixth-amendment trial-court
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw DueProcess
AdministrativeLaw DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2023-12-08
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the trial court's arbitrary and unreasonable denial of a continuance violated the Petitioner's Sixth Amendment rights
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Whether the trial court’s arbitrary and unreasonable denial of a continuance (.e., “I have full confidence in [current defense counsel’s] ability to try this case competently[, a]s you know, he’s my former law partner[, so ]I’m going to keep this on the trial docket”) — which denied the Petitioner counsel of his choice — violated the Petitioner’s Sixth Amendment rights. il B. PARTIES INVOLVED The parties involved are identified in the style of the case. iii
Docket Entries
2023-12-11
Petition DENIED.
2023-12-01
Rescheduled.
2023-12-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/8/2023.
2023-11-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/1/2023.
2023-09-18
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 2, 2023)
2023-09-05
Application (23A48) granted by Justice Thomas extending the time to file until September 18, 2023.
2023-08-31
Application (23A48) to extend further the time from September 7, 2023 to September 18, 2023, submitted to Justice Thomas.
2023-07-20
Application (23A48) granted by Justice Thomas extending the time to file until September 7, 2023.
2023-07-10
Application (23A48) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from August 8, 2023 to September 7, 2023, submitted to Justice Thomas.
Attorneys
Ian A. Milaski
Michael Robert Ufferman — Michael Ufferman Law Firm, P.A., Petitioner
Michael Robert Ufferman — Michael Ufferman Law Firm, P.A., Petitioner