Will the Supreme Court seek truth for the sake of humanity and compel the U.S.D.C. (E.D. Texas) to make available the papers of case no. G122-CV-BY?

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1) Will the SuPaeme Covat Seek Teuth Fae the Sake of humanity And come! the L.S.0,.C(E.D. TVleR Texas) ts make AVArIAble Fhe PAPERS OF CASE N0!G122-CVYBY. The 47 PAGES oF Photo CoAY Evidences And the Finshderve <ubmibed by the , Plater that diaectrs contender May/staare Judge Love RePoar nwd Recommentatan es svclusevel9 CveRy Claim of the P/AMWHTEFS Com Plath +/Lawse/#A,? 2) Ulout ReciePt, rusPecton ANA Review oF Said evidences Find Just Cause Shown to okdenh /NJuestraatew rvteo the Allegattovs oF Cadmémal ACHisvS oF LeRThW AGeHtIeS af the Linited states Groverdmenr AVA the wRewo doin9s AGAINSE the PLAINEIFE AS A Direct Resolt sf hrs ushTO Artent Peddila I'uvention oF A RenéwhDle ENcegs Trtled. "LudePendent Evengh S¥Stems L.L.S. (Free Elecrtiats) "11s 90.2) 421,471 | “ SelF Lhansing Electric vehicle adaPreas”’ USPTO No.62/92, S85 “Self chaessus Ce//Phive adacras " 4 USPTO we .62/9aI S86 « SalP thaegiag Medical nerd ery Devices LISATS wa. 62/921 594 2) Wilf the SuPaeme. Court Find Ruewn + be False and CRimindl statements made bs And tv the APPItR#eON/s For Funding 6F the Lt. S. DePnarment oF Energy. Natiurd Renewnble Evergd Labvantrty, ARTES. PRodect as same le datn thelr ard motue FoR Graveewment LonSP/RAcy anid SPT PAKENK Paotected i'wrRingemen te 4) Will the SuPreme Covet Find that the. Free, Fueless method of Stoenginls And PReod ucla Electhic'y that 1's Not Rellavt on ANS oF the Whtsral Forces of the ZAR, LE. Nb Sov No water Ne wid, No Hrarmal Ho Problem, 'S CaRtworth Aud oF Soth Public /P/InNetAaryeg ImPoRrawce AS to MERI AleviAtrw FRom AhPelinre Paceduces? (evenesely invoked) Rule I 5) Wrll He SaPReme Couat Fivd thar the PlnintlER has made incRedthle SACRIFICE. Lolth total disregard ro hie aww SAFC+Y Awd wellbe/sva FeR Years to bain this Human lereRian Chor before Hr Honorenble Suerices ta hohe Awd Erith that the evidences Avarlable when Cons deesua the Tothlina of Cracumsrances wauld Show Undue swren tiewa Awd malicious Active /oRtheSmatnvs/Phns 6F Others have made Fruit oh APolsonous TRee Doctrine APPIS AEN UOMO AM CORR AWE SWEARLCaAT Ud And Five led Roti G) will me SuPReme Court Review the Covk+ Docket Dorumenrs enclosed awd Find theeety that the C]niMnlee Aid LegallY Motion to <ubms/h Lbvdewce MAND | times wns /Heanlly AWA Again’? Ws Risht re Pare ternal denied hes lehe 10 Svbmine 7 Evidence and than d/d APPEAR IV PERS) LP OW CLERES EPRUCtYON 1 Th The Fedeart Courrheuse wv THlek TerAS » 2 Moves Fasmpncee FT Live wheredy 47 PAGES OF Federal USPTX Documents , DePRetment of Enveg 9 Ema! Phorcshres Ett. Ee, Evidences with Flachdaiye witha vies And Su PP ven S Witness AFF AAUT IS cobmined And Doteered Cece RuhA ment IN 6-22-a2) And Aven the VOLS Nert morving B-23-a7 Threered and Alresxed, of whith Police weke Mer RasPonwding ef. id Witness oF the P/atntlEP Comms BING ANS CRIME ? Smiths Latee tm sett iW Thfl 5. 7) wi . le Fuserces Plense Mee ane Sake of 7FRuth Aad Tusryee Final thie Will wha, Heao sable Je Cahn + Agenctec Wwheachy onde Fedesal Aran ess, Obtaty, The evidentes ry tharkeds ROPotnt LovnSel Fok the PIR te > “pnd Plate me sve Protect/yt 2u4 rho beFoRe these CAMMIMAS KUM Ta the best /Mictese oF Justice,’ ; a Attu’ The PlacwttfF (¢ vwder + HeGAl tucantetativn as okchesteted pred Planned bY the CRim:MM COMSSERARY PReven (HM prt Forres And evidences thus Fee whentowAly SuPPicested LY Pre GS. Govetrmn en AMA Dis tek Coutts Therevah