Whether the infliction of a life sentence upon a prisoner where the life tail is not applicable to his offense of conviction constitutes cruel and unusual punishment?

QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW I. WHETHER THE INFLICTION OF A LIFE SENTENCE UPON A PRISONER WHERE THE LIFE TAIL IS NOT APPLICABLE TO HIS OFFENSE OF CONVICTION CONSTITUTES CRUEL AND UNUSUAL PUNISHMENT? TI. WHETHER A CLAIM OF RES JUDICATA STEMMING FROM AN : INTERVENING COURT DECISION CHANGING PROCEDURAL REQUIREMENTS RELATING TO PRESENTATION OF CLAIMS REGARDING VOID SENTENCES CAN LIE TO PREVENT CORRECTION OF A VOID SENTENCE WITHOUT VIOLATICN DUE PROCESS AND EQUAL PROTECTION. OF THE LAN? ; cee GROUNDS PRESENTED FOR ISSUANCE OF THE WRIT 1. THE REFUSAL TO VACATE A LIFE SENTENCE THAT ALL PARTIES AND THE COURT AGREE IS INAPPLICABLE BASED UPON PROCEDURAL NICETIES AND SUBSEQUENT REVISIONS TO THE LAW VIOLATES THE PRISONER'S RIGHT TO EQUAL PROTECTION AND DUE PROCESS OF LAW, AND CONSTITUTES CRUEL AND UNUSUAL PUNISHMENT, IN VIOLATION OF THE FIFTH, EIGHTN AND FOURTEENTH AMENDMENTS TO THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION. -i;