No. 23-571

Madeleine Pickens v. United States

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2023-11-28
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Amici (1) Experienced Counsel
Tags: 6324(a)(2) decedent-property estate-tax estate-taxes higley-v-commissioner iRS-authority personal-liability statutory-interpretation tax-lien trust-beneficiaries
Key Terms:
Patent JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2024-03-01
Related Cases: 23-436 (Vide)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the limiting phrase in Section 6324(a)(2) applies to both the verbs 'receives' and 'has'

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED When an individual passes away, the executor of his estate must pay estate taxes. If the executor fails to pay, the Internal Revenue Service may enforce a tax lien that attaches to all estate property, and may impose personal liability on executors. This case involves an additional, extraordinary authority available to the IRS under 26 U.S.C. § 6324(a)(2). That statute provides that if estate taxes are not paid when due, an individual who falls within six statutory categories who receives, or has on the date of the decedent’s death, property included in the gross estate under sections 2034 to 2042, inclusive, to the extent of the value, at the time of the decedent’s death, of such property, shall be personally liable for such tax. Id. For nearly 100 years, all three Branches of Government agreed that this provision empowers the IRS to impose personal liability on third parties who have or receive estate property immediately “on the date of the decedent’s death,” and who can thus “delay or defeat collection” of estate taxes. Higley v. Comm’r, 69 F.2d 160, 163 (8th Cir. 1934). All three Branches also agreed that Section 6324(a)(2) does not apply to beneficiaries of a trust who receive estate assets after a decedent’s death, and who are not responsible for the distribution of the estate’s assets. In the decision below, the Ninth Circuit broke with this longstanding consensus and held that Section 6324(a)(2) applies to persons who receive estate property at the date of death or anytime thereafter. (i) ii The question presented is whether the limiting phrase in Section 6324(a)(2), “on the date of the decedent’s death,” applies to both the verbs “receives” and “has.”

Docket Entries

2024-03-04
Petition DENIED.
2024-02-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/1/2024.
2024-02-13
2023-12-21
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including January 29, 2024.
2023-12-20
Motion to extend the time to file a response from December 28, 2023 to January 29, 2024, submitted to The Clerk.
2023-12-19
2023-11-22
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 28, 2023)
2023-10-10
Application (23A311) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until November 22, 2023.
2023-10-05
Application (23A311) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from October 23, 2023 to November 22, 2023, submitted to Justice Kagan.

Attorneys

Madeleine Pickens
Neal Kumar KatyalHogan Lovells US LLP, Petitioner
Neal Kumar KatyalHogan Lovells US LLP, Petitioner
National Taxpayers Union Foundation
Joseph Darcy HenchmanNational Taxpayers Union Foundation, Amicus
Joseph Darcy HenchmanNational Taxpayers Union Foundation, Amicus
United States
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent