No. 23-5727

Jeff Baoliang Zhang v. Kory Knapke

Lower Court: California
Docketed: 2023-10-06
Status: Dismissed
Type: IFP
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: 42-U.S.C.-1983 42-usc-1983 civil-rights constitutional-violation due-process federal-constitution judicial-corruption judicial-misconduct medical-malpractice statute-of-limitations
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity
Latest Conference: 2024-01-05 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Can the lower courts ignore federal civil rights claims and allow a medical rapist to escape liability?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Can the trial court judge fool around Petitioner in a serious civil suit as he highly praised Petitioner for my presentation at the court hearing but just in a few days, he adopted all the lies of the Defendant to dismiss the case? 2. Can the California Second District Court of Appeals willfully defy the US constitution Amendment XIV by adopting all the lies with their strong discrimination against Petitioner and by applying Defendant’s inapplicable state statures of time barred to dismiss this case while even the Defendant cannot use them anymore at the Oral Argument? _ 3. Can the Judges at the state courts of California willfully defy 42. U.S.C. § 1983 by letting loose a medical rapist who brought tremendous harm to mentally healthy and innocent Petitioner from February 2012 to August 2021 in this case filled with federal civil rights claims? 4. Can the California State Supreme Court deny reviewing a case filled with violations of the US constitution and certain federal laws to ignore the lower courts’ terrible corruption and the disgusting discrimination against Petitioner in this case? ii

Docket Entries

2024-01-08
Motion for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by petitioner DENIED.
2023-12-13
Motion DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/5/2024.
2023-12-01
Motion for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by petitioner.
2023-11-20
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
2023-11-02
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/17/2023.
2023-10-20
Waiver of right of respondent Kory Knapke to respond filed.
2023-10-02
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 6, 2023)

Attorneys

Jeff Baoliang Zhang
Jeff Baoliang Zhang — Petitioner
Kory Knapke
Dana StenvickCole Pedroza, LLP, Respondent